A let property is not underwritten as a home. The building is occupied by someone with no financial stake in it, the owner is rarely on site to notice a problem early, and the policy has to respond to loss of rental income as well as damage to the structure.
Escape of water is a common source of claims for landlords. A failed flexible hose or a leaking heating pipe in an occupied flat can run for hours before anyone reports it, and in a converted property the water travels into the flat below, which turns one incident into two claims and a dispute about who pays.
Periods between tenancies matter more than most owners expect. Most policies restrict cover once a property has been empty beyond a stated number of days, commonly thirty or forty five, and restrictions may apply to theft, malicious damage and escape of water: precisely the risks an empty property is most exposed to.
We can advise on how a let property should be insured given the type of tenant, the length of the tenancy and how the property is managed, and on the conditions that most often catch landlords out at claim stage.
The exposures that produce claims in this trade, rather than a generic list.
One of the most common landlord claims. A washing machine hose, a radiator valve or a failed seal releases water while the tenant is at work, and in a flat conversion it reaches the ceiling below. Repairing the source is minor; drying the structure, replacing flooring and settling the downstairs owner's claim is not.
Accidental damage by a tenant is often excluded unless specifically added, and malicious damage by a tenant is usually a separate extension with its own excess. The distinction decides most disputed landlord claims, and it turns on intent, which is rarely easy to evidence once the tenant has gone.
If a fire or flood makes the property uninhabitable the rent stops but the mortgage does not. Loss of rent cover is normally expressed as a percentage of the buildings sum insured or a set number of months, and the figure has to be long enough to cover reinstatement plus re-letting, not just the building works.
A void of a few weeks between tenants is ordinary letting, but it can still trigger the unoccupancy clause. Insurers expect notification beyond the stated period, and often impose conditions such as draining down the system in winter, weekly inspections and securing the letterbox.
As the owner of the structure the landlord carries liability for the parts they remain responsible for: the roof, the boundary walls, the common stairs in a conversion, and anything the tenancy agreement leaves with the owner. A tile from a poorly maintained roof injuring a passer-by is the owner's claim, not the tenant's.
We arrange insurance around the property, its use, construction, occupancy and ownership structure. The cover available will depend on the individual risk and the terms offered by insurers.
The structure on a reinstatement basis, which is the cost of rebuilding rather than what the property would sell for. In a flat conversion the sum insured should reflect that flat's share of the whole building, including its portion of the roof and foundations.
Injury or damage to third parties arising from ownership of the building. Most landlord policies carry £2m or £5m as standard, and a managing agent or a lender will sometimes specify the figure they require.
Pays the rent you would have received while the property cannot be lived in following an insured loss, and the cost of housing the tenant if the tenancy obliges you to. Usually a percentage of the buildings sum insured.
Carpets, curtains, white goods and any furniture provided with the let. A furnished let needs a realistic figure here; an unfurnished one still usually needs something for flooring and kitchen appliances.
Normally an extension rather than standard cover, and often subject to a larger excess and a requirement that the deposit is pursued first. Worth taking where the tenant type or turnover makes it a realistic prospect.
Having these to hand shortens the process considerably, and usually improves the terms.
The main factors insurers consider when assessing the premium.
The sum insured is the main driver, followed by construction and age. A Victorian conversion with solid walls and a slate roof costs more to reinstate per square metre than a modern flat, and non standard construction narrows the number of insurers willing to quote.
Long term working tenants attract the keenest terms. Student lets, housing benefit tenancies and local authority placements are rated higher, mainly on malicious damage and frequency of change, and some insurers may decline these risks or apply more restrictive terms.
Flood zone and subsidence history move the price more than anything the landlord controls. A property in a flood risk postcode may be insurable only with a flood excess in the thousands, or through the Flood Re scheme where the property qualifies.
Two escape of water claims in three years will be reflected in both premium and excess. Accepting a higher voluntary excess on water damage is one of the factors that may help manage the premium or excess on a property with that history.
Terms vary between insurers, so treat these as the questions to ask rather than a description of any one policy.
Beyond the stated number of days, typically thirty or forty five, cover narrows sharply. Theft, malicious damage, escape of water and accidental damage are the usual casualties, so cover may be significantly restricted, depending on the policy wording, unless the insurer is told and agrees terms.
A slow leak that has been seeping for months, perished seals, failing pointing and rot are maintenance rather than insured damage. The resulting sudden escape may be covered while the cause of it is not, which is why insurers ask about the age of the plumbing and the boiler.
A landlord policy does not insure the tenant's belongings, and the tenant's own contents policy does not insure the structure. Where a tenant has been flooded by a fault in the building, their insurer will usually pursue the landlord's liability rather than simply pay out.
A policy arranged for a single family let does not automatically respond if the property is later let room by room, to students, or on short term holiday lets. Each changes the risk enough that the insurer expects to be told and to re-rate.
No. A residential policy is written on the basis that the owner occupies the property, and letting it without telling the insurer may invalidate or restrict cover, depending on the policy wording and circumstances. Once a tenant moves in the property needs a landlord or property owners policy.
There is no law requiring it, but a buy to let mortgage almost always makes buildings insurance a condition of the loan, and a leasehold flat will usually require it under the terms of the lease. Employers' liability becomes a legal requirement if you employ anyone, such as a cleaner or caretaker.
Most policies allow thirty or forty five consecutive days, after which restrictions apply. The period is stated in the policy rather than being standard across the market, so it is worth checking the number and telling the insurer before a void runs past it.
Usually the freeholder or the residents' management company insures the whole structure and recharges the cost through the service charge. In that case you would typically insure your own contents, your liability as an owner, and loss of rent, rather than the building itself.
Call 01304 262880 and speak to a broker, or email info@truerisksolutions.co.uk with what you do, what you need cover for and a phone number with the best time to call, and a broker will call you back. We need a phone number to quote, because the cover and the price depend on questions that are quicker to answer on a call than by email.
Tell us about your business and the work you undertake, and we will come back to you with cover options built around it. Call 01304 262880, or email us with a phone number and the best time to call and a broker will ring you back.