An office is a low hazard building with a high value fit out. There is little in the way of process risk, so common claims and exposures include water, fire from electrical origin, and damage during the fit outs that happen every time a tenant moves in or out.
Escape of water is a significant exposure for office buildings. Pipework runs above suspended ceilings through floors full of desks, servers and cabling, and a leak on the fourth floor on a Friday evening is found on Monday morning three floors further down.
Occupancy patterns have changed and insurers ask about it. Floors let but rarely used, tenants on flexible terms and whole buildings running at part capacity all raise the unoccupancy question, and the answer affects both terms and conditions.
We can advise owners, managing agents and residents' companies on insuring office buildings, from a single suite above a shop to a multi let block with its own plant, lifts and common parts.
The exposures that produce claims in this trade, rather than a generic list.
Chilled water, heating and sprinkler pipework runs through the ceiling void above the working floor. When it fails the damage is to ceilings, lighting, cabling, IT and the floor below, and the resulting reinstatement and business interruption costs can significantly exceed the cost of repairing the original leak.
Offices are refitted constantly. Contractors cut into walls and ceilings, isolate alarms and sprinklers, and leave hot works and temporary electrics behind them. A large share of office fires and floods start during somebody's fit out rather than during ordinary occupation.
Server rooms, comms cabinets, chargers and kitchen appliances concentrate electrical load in areas that are unattended overnight. Insurers expect a current electrical installation condition report and increasingly ask about thermographic surveys on larger buildings.
Reception, lifts, stairs, car parks and plant rooms remain the owner's responsibility in a multi let office. Falls on stairs and in car parks are the routine liability claim, and lift entrapment the one that generates complaints even when nobody is hurt.
A floor under lease that nobody attends is not obviously unoccupied, but it behaves like it: no one notices a leak, a failed alarm or a propped fire door. This is the gap between what the lease says and what the building is actually doing.
We arrange insurance around the property, its use, construction, occupancy and ownership structure. The cover available will depend on the individual risk and the terms offered by insurers.
The structure, landlord's fixtures and the base build services on a reinstatement basis. On an office the plant is a meaningful part of the sum insured: lifts, air conditioning, boilers, switchgear and the building management system.
Liability arising from ownership of the building and its common parts. Limits of £5m or £10m may be appropriate depending on the building, occupancy and contractual requirements, including larger multi let buildings and those with underground parking.
Rent and, where insured, service charge income lost while the building cannot be occupied. On a multi let office this needs to reflect that a single incident can put several tenancies out of use at once.
Lifts, air conditioning pressure systems and any lifting equipment require statutory thorough examination. In a multi let office the duty usually sits with the owner because the plant serves the whole building.
Sudden failure of lifts, chillers, boilers and switchgear. Not damage in the ordinary sense, which is why it is a separate section, and on an office it is cover that can help address the financial impact of equipment breakdown.
Having these to hand shortens the process considerably, and usually improves the terms.
The main factors insurers consider when assessing the premium.
A fully let building of ordinary office tenants is the keenest risk on this class. Part occupancy, flexible or serviced occupation, and any non office use in the building all move the rate.
Modern plant with current inspection records and a recent electrical report rates better. Ageing pipework and switchgear are what sit behind the two claim types that dominate this class.
Repeat water claims affect office terms more than anything else, and insurers respond with a separate, higher escape of water excess rather than simply increasing the premium.
Sprinkler protection materially improves terms on a larger office, and addressable detection with a monitored connection helps on any of them, because it shortens the time between a leak or a fire starting and somebody attending.
Terms vary between insurers, so treat these as the questions to ask rather than a description of any one policy.
The owner's policy covers the base building and landlord's fixtures. Desks, servers, cabling and the tenant's fit out are theirs to insure, and after a flood the argument is usually about which side of that line the flooring and ceiling tiles fall.
Where a tenant's contractor causes the damage, the claim generally belongs to that contractor's liability insurer. The owner's policy may respond in the first instance, but expect the insurer to pursue recovery, and expect questions about what was required of the contractor.
Conditions can apply to a part of a building as well as the whole. A vacant floor beyond the stated period usually brings inspection requirements and a narrower set of perils for that part.
Wear in a chiller, a boiler at the end of its life or corrosion in pipework is maintenance. The sudden consequence may be insured while the cause is not, which is why the age and service history of plant is asked about.
No. The owner's policy covers the building, the common parts and the landlord's fixtures. Tenants insure their own contents, IT and fit out, and should also carry their own business interruption because your loss of rent cover protects your income, not theirs.
It varies by insurer, and it can apply floor by floor rather than only to a whole building. If a floor is empty, or let but genuinely not attended, tell the insurer: most will keep cover broadly intact given inspections and isolation of services.
If the building has a lift or pressure systems, yes. Thorough examination is a statutory duty separate from insuring the plant against damage, and in a multi let office it usually falls to the owner because the plant serves everyone.
On a building where a failed lift or chiller would stop tenants working, generally yes. Damage cover responds to a fire or a flood, not to a chiller simply failing, and the cost of hiring temporary plant is often the part that stings.
Call 01304 262880 and speak to a broker, or email info@truerisksolutions.co.uk with what you do, what you need cover for and a phone number with the best time to call, and a broker will call you back. We need a phone number to quote, because the cover and the price depend on questions that are quicker to answer on a call than by email.
Tell us about your business and the work you undertake, and we will come back to you with cover options built around it. Call 01304 262880, or email us with a phone number and the best time to call and a broker will ring you back.