Damp proofing sits closer to professional services than most people in the trade realise. You are diagnosing a problem, specifying a remedy, and then guaranteeing that the remedy works, often for decades. That is three separate liabilities, and only one of them, the physical work, is what a standard contractors policy is built around.
The one that produces claims is the guarantee. Long term guarantees are the industry's main selling point and its main exposure, because insurance policies almost universally exclude efficacy, meaning they will not pay because a treatment failed to achieve the promised result. Insurance backed guarantees exist precisely because ordinary liability cover does not do this job.
Misdiagnosis is the other one. Condensation misidentified as rising damp leads to an injected course that was never going to work, and the claim is not about workmanship but about the advice. That is professional indemnity territory, and a great many damp proofing contractors do not carry it.
We arrange cover for damp proofing, basement waterproofing and timber treatment contractors, and the two questions worth settling early are how your guarantees are backed and whether you carry cover for the advice as well as the work.
The exposures that produce claims in this trade, rather than a generic list.
A twenty or thirty year guarantee is a contractual promise that the work will keep performing. Liability policies exclude efficacy, so if the treatment fails and the customer claims under the guarantee, the policy does not respond. That obligation sits on the business, which is why insurance backed guarantees are arranged separately.
The most common professional claim in the trade. Condensation, penetrating damp, plumbing leaks and rising damp present similarly and require entirely different remedies. Specifying and carrying out the wrong one produces a claim for the cost of the unnecessary work plus the cost of the correct remedy plus the continuing damage.
A failed basement waterproofing system floods a finished habitable space, and the damage runs through floors, walls, contents and often electrics. Basement conversions carry the highest values in this trade and the least tolerance for failure.
Injected damp proof courses and timber treatments involve chemicals applied inside occupied buildings. Exposure to occupants, damage to finishes and staining are all live exposures, and treatment in confined roof voids and cellars adds a health and safety dimension.
Hacking off plaster, removing floors, and excavating internally to install drainage or a membrane system all disturb the fabric of an occupied building. Where a wall turns out to be doing more structural work than assumed, the intervention becomes a much larger problem.
Policies are put together around how you work. Employers liability is included as standard wherever you employ anyone.
Third party injury and property damage arising from the work. Most damp proofing takes place in occupied homes and buildings, so damage to decoration, flooring and contents is the frequent claim.
Legally required and included as standard at £10m. Work in cellars, roof voids and confined spaces, with chemicals, is the exposure underwriters focus on.
The cover that matches this trade's actual risk. Responds to claims arising from surveys, diagnosis and specification, which is where the expensive claims come from. Written on a claims made basis, so it must be maintained continuously and after you stop trading.
Covers the works in progress: membranes, tanking, drainage and replastering before handover. On basement work the value and the exposure to water during construction are both significant.
Injection equipment, pumps, dehumidifiers, moisture meters and hand tools. Dehumidifiers and drying equipment are frequently left in customers' properties for extended periods, which is worth confirming is covered.
Having these to hand shortens the process considerably, and usually improves the terms.
Where the price actually comes from, and which parts of it you can change.
A contractor who only installs to somebody else's specification carries far less professional exposure than one producing surveys that purchasers and lenders rely on. That distinction drives the professional indemnity element entirely.
Habitable basement waterproofing carries the highest values and the least tolerance for failure in this trade, and rates well above ordinary damp proofing and timber treatment.
Long guarantees backed by a recognised insurance backed guarantee scheme present better than long guarantees backed by nothing but the company, because the latter concentrates the obligation on a business that may not outlast it.
Recognised technician qualifications and trade body membership carry real weight in a trade where the main risk is the quality of the diagnosis.
Guarantee claims settled directly, without an insurer involved, still matter and should be disclosed. A pattern of them indicates a diagnostic problem rather than bad luck.
Terms vary between insurers, so treat these as the questions to ask rather than a description of any one policy.
The central exclusion in this trade. Policies do not pay because a treatment failed to work. If a customer claims under your twenty year guarantee, that obligation is yours and not your insurer's, which is exactly why insurance backed guarantee schemes exist as a separate product.
Removing a failed system and installing a correct one is a rectification cost. What is insured is the damage caused to other property, such as flooring and decoration ruined by continuing water ingress.
Public liability responds to injury and damage, not to the consequences of a diagnosis being wrong. Since misdiagnosis is the most common serious claim in this trade, a contractor with only public liability is uninsured for the thing most likely to happen.
You are not insuring the state of the building you were called to. The distinction between damage caused by your work and damage that was already progressing is what condition surveys and dated photographs at the start of a job are for.
Liability policies generally respond to sudden and accidental damage. Damage that develops gradually over months, which is the natural pattern of a failed waterproofing system, can fall outside cover, and this is worth understanding before relying on the policy for it.
No, and this is the most important thing to understand in this trade. Liability policies exclude efficacy, which means they do not pay because a treatment failed to achieve the result you promised. A twenty or thirty year guarantee is a contractual obligation of your business, and if the business cannot meet it, the customer has nothing. Insurance backed guarantee schemes exist specifically to fill this gap by providing a separate policy that responds if the contractor is no longer able to.
If you diagnose problems and specify remedies, which is most of the trade, then yes. The most common serious claim in damp proofing is misdiagnosis: condensation treated as rising damp, or a plumbing leak treated as penetrating damp. The customer's loss is the cost of the wrong work, the cost of the right work and the damage that continued in the meantime. Public liability does not respond to any of that, because none of it is damage your work caused. Professional indemnity does.
It depends what is being claimed. Removing and replacing the failed waterproofing system is a rectification cost and is not insured. Damage the flooding caused to flooring, plaster, contents and electrics may be a public liability claim, though gradual damage over months can fall outside cover where the policy responds only to sudden and accidental damage. If the system failed because the specification was wrong rather than the installation, it becomes a professional indemnity matter.
Public liability covers what your hands did: injury to people and damage to property caused by carrying out the work. Professional indemnity covers what your judgement did: a survey that reached the wrong conclusion, a specification that was inappropriate, a report a buyer relied on. In damp proofing the second is where the larger and more frequent claims sit, because customers are buying an assessment as much as an installation. Carrying only public liability leaves the main exposure uninsured.
It is worth checking, because it is easily missed. Dehumidifiers and drying equipment are often left running in a property for days or weeks, away from your premises and outside your control. Standard tools cover may be limited to equipment on site during working hours or in a locked vehicle. Where you routinely leave equipment out, tell your broker so the cover reflects it rather than discovering the limitation after a unit disappears.
For as long as claims could realistically be brought, which in this trade is a long time because guarantees run for decades and defects surface slowly. Professional indemnity is claims made, so a policy in force today is what responds to a claim about a survey you did years ago. Once you stop trading there is no renewing policy, so run off cover continues that protection. Six years is a common minimum, matching the limitation period for simple contracts, and longer is often sensible given how long damp proofing guarantees run.
Tell us what you actually do and we will come back to you with cover options built around it.